It would appear that HUD does not want CRC, nor the general public, to know more information about reverse mortgages, complaints about them, or foreclosures on surviving spouses.
In late 2014, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to HUD, asking, among other things for data related to:
- the number of complaints that have been filed to HUD about reverse mortgages serviced by Financial Freedom;
- any data on estimates of the number of non-borrowing spouses who could face foreclosure if their reverse mortgage borrowing spouse were to pass away;
- the number of complaints made against Financial Freedom, a reverse mortgage servicer that is owned by OneWest Bank, a bank which is trying to merge with CIT Group; and
- the number of foreclosures on surviving spouses by Financial Freedom since April 2009, and the number of foreclosures for the industry as a whole.
In December 2014, HUD denied our request for a fee waiver. We appealed.
Today, we heard back that we have lost our appeal. HUD’s letter to CRC suggests that we failed to meet the criteria that “the disclosure of the information would contribute significantly to the public’s understanding of government activities or operations.”
To understand why this is so problematic, consider why we submitted a FOIA request in the first place.
For years, reverse mortgage brokers have been telling couples that it is okay to remove the younger spouse from the title of the home in order for the older spouse to obtain a reverse mortgage. Couples were told there was no chance the younger spouse would be kicked out if the older spouse were to pass away, or in other cases (like this one), they were told the younger spouse could be added onto the mortgage as soon as they turned 62. All of this was done with HUD turning a blind eye to this practice. Unfortunately, as the older spouses have passed away, reverse mortgage servicers have been moving to foreclose on the surviving spouse.
HUD is already being sued for enabling these foreclosures and as a result, a federal judge ordered HUD to develop a policy to assist theses non-borrowing, surviving spouses. The policy that HUD announced in January is NOT expected to help any surviving spouses because it relies on the servicer’s discretion and because it would likely require the surviving spouse to come up with a large lump sum of cash. For more on this, see today’s press release: Advocates: Grandma May Get Run Over By HUD’s New Reverse Mortgage Policy
So, what should one conclude from HUD denying a fee waiver for our FOIA request because granting it would NOT contribute significantly to the public’s understanding of government activities or operations?
We feel the public would gain a lot from this knowledge.
A 2013 story below illustrate why we think it’s important for HUD to disclose this information. Stay tuned to hear our next steps.
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.– In 2007, a knock at Barbara Freeman front door, came with a great opportunity: to be debt-free and take care of her sick husband.
This year, another knock at that same door was a sheriff’s deputy serving foreclosure papers — and that’s when her nightmare began.
The widow is now at the brink of losing everything she and her husband worked for all because of a reverse mortgage. In the most simplified terms, reverse mortgages differ from “regular mortgages” because in the latter, a homeowner makes monthly payments to a lender.
Watch the full story here: Reverse Mortgage Nightmare: Widow Facing Foreclosure